
{"id":7930,"date":"2026-08-01T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-01T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cys.group\/?post_type=article&#038;p=7930"},"modified":"2026-09-22T14:02:58","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T12:02:58","slug":"what-does-a-negative-enps-mean","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/article\/what-does-a-negative-enps-mean\/","title":{"rendered":"What does a negative eNPS mean?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A negative eNPS means that more employees would <em>not<\/em> recommend your organisation as an employer than those who would. Concretely: the score falls below zero, and that is a signal that the employee experience requires structural attention. In this article we answer the most frequently asked questions about a negative employee net promoter score, from calculation to improvement.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-is-an-enps-score-calculated\">How is an eNPS score calculated?<\/h2>\n<p>The eNPS, or employee net promoter score, is calculated by asking employees one central question: \"How likely are you to recommend this organisation as an employer?\" on a scale of 0 to 10. Promoters (9\u201310) minus detractors (0\u20136), divided by the total number of respondents and multiplied by 100, gives the eNPS score. Passives (7\u20138) are not included in the calculation.<\/p>\n<p>The formula works as follows:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Calculate the percentage of promoters (score 9 or 10).<\/li>\n<li>Calculate the percentage of detractors (score 0 through 6).<\/li>\n<li>Subtract the percentage of detractors from the percentage of promoters.<\/li>\n<li>The result is the eNPS score, which ranges from -100 to +100.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>An example: if 30% of your employees give a 9 or 10 and 50% give a 6 or lower, the eNPS is 30 minus 50 = -20. The score is negative as soon as there are more detractors than promoters. That sounds alarming, but the score alone does not tell you <em>why<\/em> employees are dissatisfied. For that, you need the stories behind the numbers.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"when-is-an-enps-negative-and-how-negative-is-too-negative\">When is an eNPS negative, and how negative is too negative?<\/h2>\n<p>An eNPS is negative as soon as the score falls below zero. Any score below zero indicates that more employees are discouraging others from joining the organisation than are recommending it. As a consistent benchmark: a score between -10 and 0 requires attention, a score between -20 and -10 requires active follow-up, and a score below -20 requires immediate action.<\/p>\n<p>eNPS benchmarks vary considerably by sector. In sectors with high workloads or large operational workforces, scores are structurally lower than in knowledge-intensive environments. The most dangerous signal is not a low score at a single measurement point, but a declining trend across multiple measurements. A score that falls further every quarter tells a different story than a score that is stably low but not worsening.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever the score: a negative eNPS is only useful once you know which groups of employees make up the detractors, in which department or job category dissatisfaction is greatest, and which themes recur in the open-ended responses. A number without context is a starting point, not an endpoint.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-are-the-most-common-causes-of-a-negative-enps\">What are the most common causes of a negative eNPS?<\/h2>\n<p>The most common causes of a negative employee net promoter score are a lack of recognition and growth opportunities, insufficient trust in management, high workload without adequate autonomy, and the feeling that feedback is not acted upon. None of these causes is directly visible in the score itself; they only surface when you ask follow-up questions.<\/p>\n<p>From our experience in employee research, a number of patterns recur consistently:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Lack of follow-up:<\/strong> employees who gave feedback previously and heard nothing back are more likely to become detractors at the next measurement.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Unclear expectations:<\/strong> employees who do not know where they stand score lower on willingness to recommend.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Unsafe culture:<\/strong> when employees feel that honesty carries risks, they give lower scores or do not respond at all.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Mismatch between expectation and reality:<\/strong> particularly among new employees, when the onboarding promise does not match the day-to-day reality.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The driver model we use at CYS Group maps precisely these causes without complex statistics. By identifying which factors correlate most strongly with a low recommendation score, you know where to start first.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-the-difference-between-enps-and-employee-satisfaction\">What is the difference between eNPS and employee satisfaction?<\/h2>\n<p>The eNPS measures employees' willingness to recommend the organisation as an employer, while employee satisfaction measures the extent to which employees are satisfied with specific aspects of their work. An employee may be perfectly satisfied with their salary and working hours, yet still not recommend the organisation because they have reservations about the culture or leadership. The two measures capture different things.<\/p>\n<p>Satisfaction relates to the presence of good working conditions: a pleasant workplace, fair pay, clear responsibilities. The eNPS goes a step further: would you recommend this organisation to a friend or colleague? That is a stronger statement, because in doing so you also put your own reputation on the line.<\/p>\n<p>Engagement sits between the two. An engaged employee is emotionally connected to the organisation and actively contributes. Someone can be satisfied without being engaged, and engaged without actively promoting the organisation. The eNPS is therefore one of the most direct indicators of how employees <em>externally<\/em> position the organisation, which has a direct impact on employer branding and recruitment.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-do-you-structurally-improve-a-negative-enps\">How do you structurally improve a negative eNPS?<\/h2>\n<p>You structurally improve a negative eNPS not just by measuring, but by consistently following up. That means: identifying drivers, setting priorities per team, linking concrete actions to the outcomes, and showing employees that their feedback leads to change. Without that feedback loop, response rates decline and the score falls further.<\/p>\n<p>An approach that works follows these steps:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Identify the drivers:<\/strong> which factors correlate most strongly with a low recommendation score? Use a driver analysis to prioritise.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Segment the outcomes:<\/strong> look at where dissatisfaction is greatest by department, job category, or tenure. An average score masks significant differences.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Link actions to teams:<\/strong> managers need team-level reports they can act on directly, not just an organisation-wide score.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Close the loop:<\/strong> communicate back what you are doing with the feedback. Closed-loop follow-up is the most underestimated step in any employee research programme.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Measure more frequently:<\/strong> an annual employee survey is too slow to make improvement visible. Pulse measurements provide faster insight into whether actions are having an effect.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Improvement rarely happens quickly. But employees who see that their voice is taken seriously are more willing to answer honestly next time. That makes the measurement more reliable and the improvement more sustainable. More about the approach to <a href=\"https:\/\/cys.group\/ex-mto\/?_gl=1*15lufbx*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTcyNTU2OTMyOS4xNzgzMzI3NzMz*_ga_3M1MQPVW23*czE3ODMzMjc3MzIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODMzMjc3MzIkajYwJGwwJGgw\">measuring and improving the employee experience<\/a> can be found on our EX page.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"when-should-you-stop-using-enps-as-a-measurement-tool\">When should you stop using eNPS as a measurement tool?<\/h2>\n<p>You should stop using eNPS as a measurement tool when the score consistently fails to lead to action, when response rates are so low that the outcomes are no longer representative, or when employees have lost confidence that their answers remain anonymous. In those cases you are still measuring, but you are no longer measuring anything meaningful.<\/p>\n<p>That does not mean you stop listening altogether. It means you need to reconsider the measurement tool or the measurement approach. Sometimes an alternative metric fits the organisation's current phase better. The Employee Energy Pulse, which measures workplace happiness and energy levels, provides more actionable insight in some contexts than a single recommendation question.<\/p>\n<p>Another signal to stop is when the eNPS score is consistently positive and the organisation needs depth rather than breadth. At that point it is time to look beyond the score and examine specific journey moments \u2014 such as onboarding or exit conversations \u2014 rather than continuing to repeat one overarching question.<\/p>\n<p>The eNPS is a powerful signal, but not an end in itself. What matters is what you do with it.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-cys-group-helps-with-a-negative-enps\">How CYS Group helps with a negative eNPS<\/h2>\n<p>A negative eNPS is a starting point, not an endpoint. At CYS Group we help organisations turn that score into a concrete story: what is happening, why, and what is the first step? We do this using our own methodology and the cx.management platform.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Driver analysis without statistical expertise:<\/strong> our driver model shows which factors most strongly influence the recommendation score, so you know where to start rather than having to guess.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Team reports for managers:<\/strong> not organisation-wide averages, but insights per team that managers can act on immediately.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Closed-loop follow-up:<\/strong> we help you feed the results back to employees, so the loop is genuinely closed.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Pulse measurements alongside the annual employee survey:<\/strong> for organisations that want to see sooner whether improvements are having an effect.<\/li>\n<li><strong>GDPR-compliant and ISO 27001-certified:<\/strong> anonymity and data protection are guaranteed, even for small teams.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Would you like to know what the negative eNPS in your organisation concretely means and where you should take action first? <a href=\"https:\/\/cys.group\/contact\/?_gl=1*tjgq9k*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTQ0Nzc3Mjk2LjE3ODI3NDM4MzI.*_ga_3M1MQPVW23*czE3ODI3NDM4MzEkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODI3NDM4MzEkajYwJGwwJGgw\">Get in touch<\/a> and we will be happy to think it through with you.<\/p>\n<p><em>Make every experience count.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-seoaic-faq-block\">\n    <h2 class=\"seoaic-faq-section-title\" id=\"frequently-asked-questions\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n            <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe vaak moet je de eNPS meten om een betrouwbaar beeld te krijgen?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Voor de meeste organisaties is een combinatie van een jaarlijks uitgebreid medewerkersonderzoek en kwartaallijkse pulse-metingen het meest effectief. De jaarlijkse meting geeft diepgang en context, terwijl pulse-metingen je in staat stellen om snel te zien of ingezette verbeteracties daadwerkelijk effect hebben. Meet je alleen jaarlijks, dan loop je het risico dat je te laat bijstuurt en medewerkers het gevoel krijgen dat er toch niets verandert.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat doe je als leidinggevenden weerstand bieden tegen het delen van teamresultaten?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Weerstand bij leidinggevenden ontstaat vaak uit angst voor afrekening op slechte scores. Maak daarom vanaf het begin duidelijk dat teamrapportages bedoeld zijn als hulpmiddel voor verbetering, niet als beoordelingsinstrument. Betrek leidinggevenden actief bij het interpreteren van de resultaten en geef hen concrete handvatten om met hun team in gesprek te gaan. Wanneer managers zien dat de data hen helpt in plaats van beoordeelt, neemt de bereidheid om ermee aan de slag te gaan sterk toe.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe zorg je ervoor dat medewerkers de eNPS-vraag serieus invullen en niet strategisch scoren?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Strategisch scoren \u2014 waarbij medewerkers bewust extreem laag of hoog antwoorden om een punt te maken \u2014 verminder je door vertrouwen in de anonimiteit van de meting te vergroten en door consistent te laten zien dat eerlijke feedback tot zichtbare veranderingen leidt. Voeg altijd een open vervolgvraag toe zoals 'Wat is de belangrijkste reden voor je score?', zodat de context van het cijfer inzichtelijk wordt. Medewerkers die weten dat hun toelichting gelezen en serieus genomen wordt, zijn eerder geneigd eerlijk te antwoorden.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Kun je een negatieve eNPS ook gebruiken in gesprekken met directie of bestuur om budget vrij te maken voor verbeteringen?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Absoluut, maar vertaal de score dan naar zakelijke impact. Een negatieve eNPS hangt samen met hogere uitstroom, lagere productiviteit en hogere wervingskosten \u2014 factoren die directies en besturen direct begrijpen. Koppel de eNPS-data aan beschikbare HR-metrics zoals verloop en ziekteverzuim om een business case te bouwen. Een score van -20 is abstract; de berekening dat elk procentpunt extra verloop je organisatie X euro kost, is dat niet.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat is een realistisch tijdspad om een negatieve eNPS significant te verbeteren?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Reken op minimaal zes tot twaalf maanden voordat structurele verbeteringen zichtbaar worden in de score, mits je consequent opvolgt en communiceert. Snelle wins \u2014 zoals het terugkoppelen van resultaten en het oppakken van kleine, zichtbare verbeterpunten \u2014 kunnen al binnen een kwartaal het vertrouwen van medewerkers herstellen. Wees realistisch richting de organisatie: een score verbetert niet door te meten, maar door te handelen op wat de meting onthult.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe ga je om met een lage respons op de eNPS-meting?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Een respons onder de 60% maakt de uitkomsten statistisch minder betrouwbaar en vergroot het risico op vertekening. Verhoog de respons door de meting kort en toegankelijk te houden, leidinggevenden actief te laten oproepen tot deelname, en medewerkers vooraf te informeren over wat er met de uitkomsten gebeurt. Als de respons structureel laag blijft, is dat op zichzelf al een signaal: medewerkers geloven niet dat hun stem iets uitmaakt, wat een urgent aandachtspunt is.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Is een eNPS van nul ook een probleem, of is dat een neutrale score?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Een eNPS van nul is technisch gezien geen negatieve score, maar het is zeker geen reden voor tevredenheid. Het betekent dat het aantal promoters en detractors precies in evenwicht is, wat aangeeft dat een grote groep medewerkers de organisatie actief zou afraden. Bovendien tellen passives \u2014 medewerkers met een score van 7 of 8 \u2014 niet mee in de berekening, terwijl zij bij de minste tegenvaller kunnen doorschuiven naar detractor. Een score rond nul vraagt daarom om evenveel aandacht als een licht negatieve score.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>More detractors than promoters? Discover what a negative eNPS really means \u2014 and how to turn it around.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":7925,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"wds_primary_category":0},"categories":[1],"class_list":["post-7930","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ongecategoriseerd"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/7930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}