
{"id":8074,"date":"2026-08-05T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-05T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cys.group\/?post_type=article&#038;p=8074"},"modified":"2026-09-22T14:03:07","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T12:03:07","slug":"how-to-get-employees-motivated","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/article\/how-to-get-employees-motivated\/","title":{"rendered":"How do you motivate employees?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Motivating employees starts with understanding what drives them. Workplace motivation does not arise from an annual review or a small perk, but from a combination of meaningful work, recognition, autonomy, and trust in leadership. Those who consistently listen to employees and act on what they hear build an environment in which motivation grows naturally. In this article, we answer the most frequently asked questions about employee motivation, from the underlying drivers to measuring the effectiveness of your approach.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-are-the-most-important-drivers-of-workplace-motivation\">What are the most important drivers of workplace motivation?<\/h2>\n<p>The most important drivers of workplace motivation are autonomy, meaning, recognition, opportunities for growth, and a safe working relationship with one's manager. Research across a wide range of organisations consistently reveals the same patterns: employees who understand why their work matters and who have the freedom to make their own decisions are structurally more motivated than colleagues who work solely on instruction.<\/p>\n<p>Motivation is not a single thing. It involves an interplay of factors that reinforce or undermine one another. The most common drivers are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Meaning and purpose:<\/strong> employees want to know that their contribution matters \u2014 to customers, colleagues, or society.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Autonomy:<\/strong> the freedom to decide how you approach your work generates energy and a sense of ownership.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Recognition:<\/strong> being seen for what you do, not only when things go wrong but also when they go right.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Growth and development:<\/strong> the opportunity to acquire new skills and advance in one's career.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Safety and trust:<\/strong> an environment in which you feel safe to be honest without facing negative consequences.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Workload and vitality:<\/strong> a balance between effort and recovery, so that energy levels remain sustainable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A striking finding in practice is that the drivers employees themselves identify as most decisive are often not the factors organisations focus on most. Salary and secondary benefits frequently score high in satisfaction surveys as hygiene factors, but they rarely explain the difference between a motivated and an indifferent employee.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-the-difference-between-engagement-and-motivation\">What is the difference between engagement and motivation?<\/h2>\n<p>Motivation is the inner drive to do something; engagement is the emotional connection an employee feels with their work, their team, and the organisation. Motivation can be temporary and task-specific, while engagement is more durable and broader in scope. An employee can be highly motivated for a specific project while feeling little connection to the organisation as a whole.<\/p>\n<p>This distinction has practical relevance for HR. High motivation without engagement often produces employees who perform well but leave quickly the moment a better opportunity arises. Engagement is the factor associated with lower absenteeism, reduced turnover, and higher customer satisfaction.<\/p>\n<p>Engagement is measured differently from motivation. Where motivation is often visible in short-term performance, measuring engagement means asking about the relationship with the organisation: \"Would you still want to work here in a year?\" or \"Would you recommend our organisation as an employer?\" The latter is precisely what the <strong>eNPS<\/strong> (Employee Net Promoter Score) measures: the extent to which employees recommend their employer to others. A low eNPS is an early warning signal that engagement is under pressure, even when day-to-day motivation still appears to be intact.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-do-you-discover-what-truly-motivates-employees\">How do you discover what truly motivates employees?<\/h2>\n<p>You discover what truly motivates employees by asking regularly, listening carefully, and translating the answers into concrete patterns. A one-off annual survey provides a snapshot; what you need is a structural picture of the drivers that shape the employee experience, broken down by team and by stage in the employment journey.<\/p>\n<p>The pitfall of many employee surveys is that they stop at a score. An NPS of 32 or a satisfaction rating of 7.2 tells you that something is going on, but not what it is, why it is happening, or what you should do about it. Only when you link scores to open-ended responses and driver analysis do you obtain actionable insights.<\/p>\n<p>In practice, this works in three steps:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Ask the right questions at the right time.<\/strong> Do not ask only at the end of the year \u2014 ask after onboarding, a reorganisation, or a longer period of sick leave. This captures the employee experience at the moment it is most relevant.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Analyse drivers, not averages.<\/strong> Which factors explain the difference between employees who score high on motivation and those who score low? Driver analysis makes this visible without requiring a statistician.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Make it concrete at team level.<\/strong> Motivation varies by department, by manager, and by role. Organisation-wide averages mask the places where action is needed most.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>By <a href=\"https:\/\/cys.group\/ex-mto\/?_gl=1*15lufbx*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTcyNTU2OTMyOS4xNzgzMzI3NzMz*_ga_3M1MQPVW23*czE3ODMzMjc3MzIkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODMzMjc3MzIkajYwJGwwJGgw\">continuously listening to employees<\/a> rather than once a year, you spot shifts in motivation earlier and can make adjustments more quickly.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"which-leadership-style-has-the-greatest-influence-on-motivation\">Which leadership style has the greatest influence on motivation?<\/h2>\n<p>Coaching leadership has the most demonstrable influence on employee motivation. Managers who ask questions rather than give orders, who create space for autonomy, and who actively support employees in their development build an environment in which motivation can flourish. This holds true broadly, regardless of sector or level of seniority.<\/p>\n<p>That does not mean directive management never works. In crisis situations or with new employees, clear structure can provide a sense of safety. But as a consistent style, directive leadership is one of the strongest predictors of low engagement and high turnover.<\/p>\n<p>What managers can do in practice to strengthen motivation:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Hold regular one-on-one conversations focused on development, not just progress updates.<\/li>\n<li>Create space to discuss mistakes without immediately looking for someone to blame.<\/li>\n<li>Involve employees in decisions that directly affect them.<\/li>\n<li>Specifically name what someone is doing well, not only what could be improved.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Team reports that give managers insight into how their team scores on engagement and motivation are a powerful tool in this regard. Not as a control mechanism, but as a conversation starter. A manager who sees that their team scores low on \"I have enough freedom to organise my own work\" has a concrete starting point for the next team meeting.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-do-you-keep-employees-motivated-during-periods-of-change\">How do you keep employees motivated during periods of change?<\/h2>\n<p>Keeping employees motivated during change requires transparent communication, involvement in the process, and attention to uncertainty. Change \u2014 whether it involves a reorganisation, a merger, or a new way of working \u2014 affects the sense of safety and control that underpins motivation.<\/p>\n<p>Organisations that manage change well typically do three things differently from those that struggle. They communicate early and honestly, even when they do not yet have all the answers. They actively listen to concerns and visibly incorporate those concerns into their decisions. And they measure along the way how employees are experiencing the change, so they can course-correct before it is too late.<\/p>\n<p>A pulse survey \u2014 a short questionnaire of two or three questions sent out at regular intervals \u2014 is an effective tool for keeping a finger on the pulse during a change process. It shows whether motivation remains stable, declines, or recovers as the change progresses. This gives managers and HR concrete information to act on, rather than having to rely on gut feeling or rumour.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-do-you-measure-whether-your-approach-is-actually-working\">How do you measure whether your approach is actually working?<\/h2>\n<p>You measure whether your approach is working by tracking motivation and engagement consistently over time and linking the outcomes to the specific actions you have taken. A single measurement says little; a trend line across multiple data points shows whether your interventions are having an effect. Combine quantitative scores with qualitative feedback to understand why something is or is not working.<\/p>\n<p>Relevant indicators to track include the eNPS (willingness to recommend the organisation as an employer), scores on specific drivers such as autonomy and recognition, absenteeism rates by team, and turnover percentages. None of these figures tells the complete story on its own, but together they provide a reliable picture of how motivation is developing.<\/p>\n<p>The danger of measuring without follow-through is that employees come to feel their input leads nowhere. This erodes trust and lowers response rates in future surveys. Closed-loop follow-up \u2014 communicating back to employees what you have done with their feedback \u2014 is therefore not a luxury but a prerequisite for a functioning system.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-cys-group-helps-measure-and-improve-employee-motivation\">How CYS Group helps measure and improve employee motivation<\/h2>\n<p>CYS Group helps HR teams and managers move from an annual employee survey to an approach that provides continuous insight and drives immediate action. Our platform <strong>cx.management<\/strong> and our <strong>Employee Energy Pulse (EEP)<\/strong> have been developed specifically for this purpose. In practice, this means:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Continuous listening<\/strong> through pulse surveys at the moments that matter most: onboarding, after a change, during periods of elevated absenteeism.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Driver analysis<\/strong> without complex statistics: we map which factors have the greatest impact on motivation and engagement, broken down by team.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Team reports<\/strong> that managers can use directly in their conversations, without having to interpret data themselves.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Closed-loop follow-up<\/strong> via the Priority Matrix: from insight to action, with visible feedback to employees.<\/li>\n<li><strong>eNPS measurement<\/strong> as a quick barometer for engagement and willingness to recommend.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Would you like to know how this works for your organisation? <a href=\"https:\/\/cys.group\/contact\/?_gl=1*tjgq9k*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTQ0Nzc3Mjk2LjE3ODI3NDM4MzI.*_ga_3M1MQPVW23*czE3ODI3NDM4MzEkbzEkZzAkdDE3ODI3NDM4MzEkajYwJGwwJGgw\">Get in touch<\/a> and we will be happy to think through an approach that fits your situation.<\/p>\n<p><em>Make every experience count.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-seoaic-faq-block\">\n    <h2 class=\"seoaic-faq-section-title\" id=\"frequently-asked-questions\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n            <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe vaak moet je medewerkersmotivatie meten om betrouwbare inzichten te krijgen?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Er is geen universeel antwoord, maar de praktijk wijst uit dat een combinatie van een jaarlijks diepgaand onderzoek \u00e9n korte pulse-metingen (bijvoorbeeld per kwartaal of na sleutelmomenten zoals onboarding of een reorganisatie) het meest effectief is. Zo heb je zowel een strategisch overzicht als actuele signalen. Het gaat er niet om zo vaak mogelijk te meten, maar op de juiste momenten \u2014 wanneer de beleving van medewerkers het meest relevant en be\u00efnvloedbaar is.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat zijn veelgemaakte fouten bij het verbeteren van medewerkersmotivatie?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Een van de grootste fouten is focussen op symptomen in plaats van oorzaken \u2014 bijvoorbeeld een teamuitje organiseren terwijl de echte oorzaak van lage motivatie een gebrek aan autonomie of erkenning is. Een andere veelgemaakte fout is meten zonder opvolging: als medewerkers nooit horen wat er met hun feedback is gedaan, daalt hun vertrouwen \u00e9n de respons bij toekomstige metingen. Tot slot onderschatten veel organisaties hoe groot de rol van de directe leidinggevende is; motivatiebeleid dat alleen op HR-niveau wordt aangestuurd, mist de dagelijkse invloed die leidinggevenden hebben.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Kan een medewerker gemotiveerd zijn zonder tevreden te zijn over zijn salaris?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Ja, en dit is een van de meest onderschatte inzichten uit motivatieonderzoek. Salaris functioneert als een zogenaamde hygi\u00ebnefactor: als het als onvoldoende wordt ervaren, demotiveert het \u2014 maar een hoger salaris op zichzelf leidt zelden tot structureel meer motivatie. Medewerkers die betekenisvol werk doen, autonomie ervaren en zich gezien voelen, zijn vaak meer gemotiveerd dan collega's met een hoger loon maar weinig van deze intrinsieke drijfveren. Dit betekent niet dat beloning er niet toe doet, maar dat het investeren in de werkomgeving en leiderschapskwaliteit een groter rendement oplevert op motivatie.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe ga je om met medewerkers die structureel laag scoren op motivatie, ondanks alle inspanningen?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Structureel lage motivatie bij een medewerker is een signaal om een eerlijk gesprek aan te gaan over de onderliggende oorzaak. Soms ligt die in factoren die w\u00e9l be\u00efnvloedbaar zijn, zoals een mismatch in takenpakket, een verstoorde werkrelatie of onvoldoende groeimogelijkheden. In andere gevallen is er sprake van een fundamentele mismatch tussen de persoon en de rol of organisatie, en is een eerlijk gesprek over een andere richting de meest respectvolle stap. Belangrijk is dat je als leidinggevende of HR niet alleen reageert op het gedrag, maar de drijfveren achter de lage motivatie probeert te begrijpen \u2014 bij voorkeur met behulp van concrete meetdata in plaats van aannames.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe betrek je leidinggevenden actief bij het verbeteren van motivatie binnen hun team?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                De sleutel is leidinggevenden voorzien van concrete, teamspecifieke inzichten in plaats van algemene organisatiecijfers. Als een leidinggevende ziet dat zijn team specifiek laag scoort op 'ik krijg voldoende erkenning voor mijn werk', heeft hij een direct aanknopingspunt voor actie. Teamrapportages die automatisch worden gegenereerd na een meting verlagen de drempel enorm. Koppel dit aan een korte training in coachend leiderschap en maak het bespreekbaar in managementoverleggen, zodat motivatie niet alleen een HR-thema is maar een gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid van het hele leiderschapsteam.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Is het meten van medewerkersmotivatie ook zinvol voor kleine organisaties of teams?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Zeker, maar de aanpak verschilt. In kleine teams (minder dan 10 personen) is anonimiteit bij schriftelijke metingen een aandachtspunt: medewerkers kunnen terughoudend zijn als ze vrezen herkend te worden. Een combinatie van een korte anonieme pulse-meting op organisatieniveau en open \u00e9\u00e9n-op-\u00e9\u00e9nconversaties op teamniveau werkt dan vaak het beste. Zelfs een simpele maandelijkse check-in met twee of drie gerichte vragen geeft waardevolle inzichten en laat medewerkers zien dat hun beleving serieus wordt genomen \u2014 wat op zichzelf al motiverend werkt.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat is een realistisch tijdspad om merkbare verbetering in motivatie te zien na een interventie?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Dat hangt sterk af van de aard van de interventie en de uitgangssituatie, maar als vuistregel geldt: kleine, zichtbare acties (zoals het structureel benoemen van successen of het invoeren van wekelijkse check-ins) kunnen al binnen vier tot acht weken een positief effect hebben op de dagelijkse motivatiebeleving. Structurele verbeteringen in betrokkenheid \u2014 zoals een cultuuromslag naar meer autonomie of psychologische veiligheid \u2014 vragen doorgaans zes tot twaalf maanden van consequent handelen. Tussentijdse pulse-metingen zijn essentieel om te zien of je op de goede weg bent en waar bijsturing nodig is.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Motivation doesn&#8217;t grow from an annual review \u2014 discover what truly drives your people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":8035,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"wds_primary_category":0},"categories":[1],"class_list":["post-8074","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ongecategoriseerd"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/8074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}