
{"id":9126,"date":"2026-10-12T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cys.group\/?post_type=article&#038;p=9126"},"modified":"2026-09-22T13:50:27","modified_gmt":"2026-09-22T11:50:27","slug":"when-to-use-ces-as-a-kpi-in-your-customer-satisfaction-survey","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/article\/when-to-use-ces-as-a-kpi-in-your-customer-satisfaction-survey\/","title":{"rendered":"When Should You Use CES as a KPI in Your Customer Satisfaction Survey?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <strong>Customer Effort Score (CES)<\/strong> is a metric that measures how much effort a customer has to put in to get something done \u2014 such as having a repair carried out, getting a question answered, or placing an order. The lower the effort, the greater the likelihood of loyalty. CES is best used at transactional moments in the customer journey, directly after a specific interaction. In this article, we answer the most frequently asked questions about CES as a KPI.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-exactly-does-the-customer-effort-score-measure\">What exactly does the Customer Effort Score measure?<\/h2>\n<p>The Customer Effort Score measures how much effort a customer had to exert to achieve their goal during a specific interaction. The core question is always a variation of: \"How easy was it to resolve your issue?\" Customers respond on a scale, usually from 1 to 7. The lower the perceived effort, the better the score.<\/p>\n<p>CES does not focus on overall satisfaction or the relationship with an organisation, but on the <em>friction<\/em> in a specific interaction. That makes it a sharp metric for operational improvements. Research in the field consistently shows that customers who have to put in little effort remain more loyal than customers who are simply satisfied. Satisfaction doesn't always stop people from switching, but high effort gives them a direct reason to do so.<\/p>\n<p>The CES question always relates to a concrete action or situation, not to a general feeling. That is also why the metric works so well after a service visit, a repair request, or a contact centre interaction.<\/p>\n<div style=\"box-sizing:border-box !important;font-family:Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Open Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif !important;margin:0 !important;padding:0 !important;line-height:1.5 !important;background:#263746 !important;border-radius:12px !important;padding:32px !important;color:#ffffff !important;\">\n <div style=\"box-sizing:border-box !important;font-family:Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Open Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif !important;margin:0 !important;padding:0 !important;line-height:1.5 !important;color:#38cfd2 !important;font-size:16px !important;font-weight:600 !important;margin-bottom:10px !important;\">CX\/KTO<\/div>\n <div style=\"box-sizing:border-box !important;font-family:Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Open Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif !important;margin:0 !important;padding:0 !important;line-height:1.5 !important;color:#ffffff !important;font-size:28px !important;font-weight:600 !important;letter-spacing:-1.12px !important;line-height:1.2 !important;margin-bottom:12px !important;\">From customer feedback to concrete action<\/div>\n <p style=\"box-sizing:border-box !important;font-family:Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Open Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif !important;margin:0 !important;padding:0 !important;line-height:1.5 !important;color:#ffffff !important;font-size:18px !important;font-weight:400 !important;line-height:30.6px !important;margin-bottom:22px !important;\">Discover what customers truly care about and give every team clear priorities to improve the customer experience in a targeted way.<\/p>\n <a href=\"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/cx-kto\/\" style=\"box-sizing:border-box !important;font-family:Inter, -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, 'Open Sans', 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif !important;margin:0 !important;padding:0 !important;line-height:1.5 !important;display:inline-block !important;background:#ffd02f !important;color:#263746 !important;border:1px solid #ffd02f !important;border-radius:100px !important;padding:12px 28px !important;font-size:18px !important;font-weight:500 !important;line-height:27px !important;text-decoration:none !important;\">Discover CX\/KTO \u2192<\/a>\n<\/div>\n<h2 id=\"when-is-ces-the-right-kpi-for-your-research\">When is CES the right KPI for your research?<\/h2>\n<p>CES is the right KPI when you want to know whether a specific interaction runs smoothly for the customer. The metric is particularly well-suited after transactional interactions: a technician resolving a fault, an agent handling a complaint, or a customer submitting a request through a web portal. Use CES at the moment when friction poses the greatest risk to customer retention.<\/p>\n<p>Situations where CES works well:<\/p>\n<ul>\n <li>After a service visit or repair by a technician<\/li>\n <li>After contact with customer service or the contact centre<\/li>\n <li>After completing a digital process, such as an application or booking<\/li>\n <li>After onboarding or getting started with a product or service<\/li>\n <li>After submitting and resolving a complaint<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>CES is less suitable when you want to measure the overall relationship with a customer, or when you want to know how someone feels about your brand. In those cases, NPS or CSAT are better choices. The strength of CES lies precisely in its focus: it is about one moment, one action, one question.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-is-the-difference-between-ces-nps-and-csat\">What is the difference between CES, NPS, and CSAT?<\/h2>\n<p>CES, NPS, and CSAT each measure a different aspect of the customer experience. <strong>CES<\/strong> measures the effort at a specific interaction. <strong>NPS<\/strong> (Net Promoter Score) measures overall loyalty and the likelihood that someone will recommend you. <strong>CSAT<\/strong> (Customer Satisfaction Score) measures satisfaction with a product, service, or interaction. The three metrics complement each other and are rarely interchangeable.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the distinction at a glance:<\/p>\n<ol>\n <li><strong>CES<\/strong> answers the question: \"How easy was this?\" Ideal after a transaction or interaction. Predicts whether a customer will return or drop off.<\/li>\n <li><strong>NPS<\/strong> answers the question: \"Would you recommend us?\" Ideal for relationship research and strategic steering. Provides a picture of loyalty over the longer term.<\/li>\n <li><strong>CSAT<\/strong> answers the question: \"How satisfied are you?\" Ideal for direct feedback on a product or service. Flexible to deploy, but less predictive of behaviour.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>In practice, you combine them smartly. After a repair visit, you use CES to measure whether the process went smoothly. In an annual relationship survey, you use NPS to gauge how customers experience the partnership as a whole. CSAT is used when you want to quickly find out whether a specific service or product is well received. The <a href=\"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/cx-kto\/\">customer satisfaction research<\/a> approach you choose depends on which question you want to answer.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-do-you-calculate-and-interpret-a-ces-score\">How do you calculate and interpret a CES score?<\/h2>\n<p>The CES score is calculated by taking the average of all responses to the CES question. On a 7-point scale, a high score (6 or 7) counts as \"low effort\" and a low score (1 or 2) counts as \"high effort.\" The higher the average, the less effort customers experience and the better the score.<\/p>\n<p>Some organisations also work with an alternative calculation method, similar to NPS: the percentage of \"low effort\" responses minus the percentage of \"high effort\" responses. This gives a spread score that is easier to compare over time.<\/p>\n<p>When interpreting the score, context matters a great deal. An average CES of 5.8 means little without a point of comparison. Therefore, look at:<\/p>\n<ul>\n <li>The trend over time: is the score improving or declining?<\/li>\n <li>Differences by team, location, or type of interaction<\/li>\n <li>The open-ended responses customers provide alongside their rating<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A number tells you <em>that<\/em> friction exists. The customer's explanation tells you <em>where<\/em> that friction lies and <em>what<\/em> you need to change. Without that context, a CES score is a starting point, not an answer.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"what-questions-do-you-ask-in-a-ces-survey\">What questions do you ask in a CES survey?<\/h2>\n<p>The core of a CES survey is one central question about perceived effort, directly followed by an open question that uncovers the reason behind the rating. The most commonly used phrasing is: \"To what extent do you agree with the following statement: [Organisation] made it easy for me to resolve my issue.\" Respondents answer on a scale from \"Strongly disagree\" to \"Strongly agree.\"<\/p>\n<p>An effective CES questionnaire is short and focused:<\/p>\n<ul>\n <li>Ask the CES question directly after the interaction, preferably within 24 hours<\/li>\n <li>Add one open follow-up question: \"What made it easy or difficult?\"<\/li>\n <li>Keep the questionnaire short \u2014 a maximum of two to three questions<\/li>\n <li>Tailor the wording to the specific moment, such as a repair, a phone call, or a digital application<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The open question is not an afterthought. It is precisely the free-text responses that reveal the root cause of high or low effort. Without that context, you know what the score is, but not why \u2014 or what you need to change.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-do-you-combine-ces-with-other-customer-metrics\">How do you combine CES with other customer metrics?<\/h2>\n<p>CES works best as part of a broader measurement programme, not as a standalone measurement. Combine CES at transactional moments with NPS at the relationship level and CSAT for product evaluations. This builds a complete picture of the customer experience, from day-to-day friction to strategic loyalty.<\/p>\n<p>A practical example: an installation company measures CES directly after every service visit to see whether the technician made things easy for the customer. At the same time, they measure NPS annually to understand how customers value the overall partnership. If NPS drops while CES remains stable, you look for the cause elsewhere in the customer journey \u2014 for example in the quoting process or invoicing.<\/p>\n<p>Smart combination also means linking metrics to each other in a dashboard. This way, you see not only what the scores are, but also which factors drive them. That is precisely where a driver analysis helps: by analysing the open responses and scores together, you discover which improvements have the greatest impact on your customer's experience.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"how-cys-group-helps-you-use-ces-effectively\">How CYS Group helps you use CES effectively<\/h2>\n<p>At CYS Group, we translate a CES score not just into a number, but into a story with a clear next step. Our approach combines the right measurement moments, smart questionnaire logic, and direct follow-up through closed-loop case management. This means you know not only how high the effort was, but also why \u2014 and what you can improve tomorrow.<\/p>\n<p>What we concretely offer:<\/p>\n<ul>\n <li>Setting up CES measurements at the right moments in the customer journey, tailored to your sector and contact channels<\/li>\n <li>Driver analysis through our own driver model, so you can see which factors drive effort without heavy statistics<\/li>\n <li>Closed-loop follow-up through our platform <strong>cx.management<\/strong>, which ensures dissatisfied customers are followed up immediately<\/li>\n <li>Dashboards that steer teams at team level, not just reports that end up in a drawer<\/li>\n <li>Linking CES to NPS and CSAT for a complete picture of the customer experience<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Want to know how CES fits into your customer satisfaction research? <a href=\"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/contact\/\">Get in touch<\/a> and we'll explore together which approach fits your organisation and objectives best.<\/p>\n<p><em>Make every experience count.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-seoaic-faq-block\">\n    <h2 class=\"seoaic-faq-section-title\" id=\"frequently-asked-questions\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n            <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                How soon after an interaction should you send out a CES survey?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Send the CES survey preferably within 24 hours of the interaction. The longer you wait, the more the memory of the interaction fades and the less reliable the responses become. For digital processes, such as an online application or booking, you can even trigger the survey immediately after completion for the highest response accuracy.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                What is a good CES score and when should I take action?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                There is no universal 'good' CES score, as this depends strongly on your sector, the type of interaction, and your historical benchmark. As a rule of thumb, an average score above 5.5 on a 7-point scale is considered positive. Take action whenever the score drops compared to a previous measurement period, when specific teams or locations consistently score lower, or when open responses reveal a recurring pain point.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Can CES also be used for digital channels such as an app or web portal?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Yes, CES is particularly well-suited for digital channels. After completing a digital process \u2014 such as submitting an application, changing a subscription, or going through an onboarding flow \u2014 CES provides direct insight into where users drop off or encounter friction. Make sure the question is specifically tailored to the digital action the customer has just completed, so the feedback remains actionable and concrete.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                What do you do with customers who give a low CES score?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Customers with a low CES score \u2014 meaning customers who had to put in a lot of effort \u2014 deserve direct follow-up through a closed-loop process. Reach out to find out exactly what went wrong and to restore the situation. This not only prevents churn, but also provides valuable information about structural bottlenecks in your processes that you can resolve for future customers.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                How many respondents do I need for a reliable CES measurement?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                For a statistically reliable CES score, you need a minimum of 30 to 50 completed questionnaires per measurement period or per segment. If you want to break results down by team, location, or type of interaction, you need sufficient responses per subgroup to draw conclusions. When interaction volumes are low, it is advisable to extend measurement periods or combine multiple periods before drawing conclusions.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                What common mistakes should I avoid when setting up a CES measurement?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                The most common mistakes are: sending the survey too late so that the memory has faded, making the questionnaire too long which reduces response rates, and reporting the CES score without following up with concrete improvement actions. Another common mistake is the absence of an open follow-up question, which means you know that friction exists but not where it lies or how to remove it.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Is CES also suitable for B2B organisations?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Absolutely. CES is also a valuable metric in B2B contexts, especially in complex service environments where multiple interactions take place, such as installations, maintenance, or technical support. In B2B, it is important to determine who you are surveying: the end user who experienced the interaction, or the decision-maker who manages the relationship. Both perspectives provide valuable but different insights.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CES measures friction at transactional moments. Discover when to use this KPI and how to interpret the score.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":8960,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"wds_primary_category":0},"categories":[1],"class_list":["post-9126","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ongecategoriseerd"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/9126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8960"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cys.group\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}